Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-03-18 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 429.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is slightly better than the iPhone SE (2022)'s overall score of 86.6. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is an older and noticeably heavier device than iPhone SE (2022), but Samsung was able to build it just a bit thinner anyway. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with Android 11 OS, while iPhone SE (2022) works with iOS 15.x OS.
IPhone SE (2022) features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has 8 GB less RAM memory and lesser cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. The iPhone SE (2022) counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, although it has a lot worse resolution of 750 x 1334 pixels, a quite lower number of pixels per inch of display and a really smaller display.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a very superior battery life than iPhone SE (2022), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots slightly better photographs and videos than iPhone SE (2022). They have the same resolution back camera, the same (4K) video definition, the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same diafragm aperture.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the iPhone SE (2022), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as iPhone SE (2022). So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the iPhone SE (2022), giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.