Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| iOS 15.x | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2022-03-18 | 2018-04-20 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 429.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 326 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone SE (2022) has a global score of 86.6, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Black Shark's global score of 80.4. The Apple iPhone SE (2022) is a noticeably newer device, and it's also somewhat thinner and notably lighter than Xiaomi Black Shark. The Apple iPhone SE (2022) counts with iOS 15.x operating system, and Xiaomi Black Shark has Android 9.0 Pie operating system.
Xiaomi Black Shark counts with a slightly better screen than iPhone SE (2022), because although it has a quite opaque screen, it also counts with a larger display, a way better resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a bit higher pixels quantity per inch in the screen. The Apple iPhone SE (2022) features a quite superior performance than Xiaomi Black Shark, because although it has 4 GB lesser RAM and less processing cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
Xiaomi Black Shark has much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone SE (2022), because it has 128 GB internal storage. The iPhone SE (2022) captures a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same video definition and a 12 mega-pixels back facing camera, the iPhone SE (2022) also has higher video frame rate.
Xiaomi Black Shark features a really longer battery duration than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 2018mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.