Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| iOS 15.x | Android 10 |
| 2022-03-18 | 2020-05-08 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| -- | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 429.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone SE (2022) is a bit better than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, with an 86.6 score against 86.6. The iPhone SE (2022) has iOS 15.x operating system, and Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with Android 10 operating system. The iPhone SE (2022) is a newer device, and it's also noticeably lighter and much thinner than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3.
The Apple iPhone SE (2022) features a better performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. IPhone SE (2022) has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, although it has a little bit lower screen density, a lot smaller screen and a much lower 750 x 1334 resolution.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 captures a lot better photos and videos than iPhone SE (2022), and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has a back camera with a much better resolution. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a very superior storage for apps and games than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a really longer battery life than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has a 134 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.