Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Interstellar Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 10.26 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS Max is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, having an 84.5 score against 83.4. IPhone XS Max's construction is thinner than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it is a little bit heavier and was released many years before. IPhone XS Max features a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and lesser CPU cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The iPhone XS Max counts with a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen and way less brightness, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1242 x 2688 and a little better pixel density. Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures way better pictures and videos than iPhone XS Max, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a camera with much more mega-pixels, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone XS Max, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a way better battery duration than iPhone XS Max, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 3179mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.