Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 456 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max has a score of 84.5, which is slightly better than the Motorola One Hyper's global score of 79.8. IPhone XS Max is an older and just a bit heavier phone than the Motorola One Hyper, but Apple managed to make it thinner anyway. The iPhone XS Max has a better display than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a display of the same size, the iPhone XS Max also has a little bit greater quantity of pixels per display inch and a quite better resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1000 GB. Apple iPhone XS Max has a faster processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has lesser processing cores (although faster), and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Apple iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
Motorola One Hyper has a much better camera than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a back camera with a way better resolution.
The Motorola One Hyper has superior battery performance than iPhone XS Max, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3179mAh.
Although iPhone XS Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola One Hyper. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the iPhone XS Max, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola One Hyper, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.