Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-09-21 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max is just a bit better than the Galaxy C7, getting a score of 84.5 against 77.7. IPhone XS Max's body is extremely newer, but somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker than Galaxy C7. Apple iPhone XS Max features a faster CPU than Galaxy C7, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64-bits processor.
IPhone XS Max counts with a much better display than Galaxy C7, because it has a little bigger screen, a higher 1242 x 2688 resolution and a bit greater count of pixels in each inch in the screen. The Apple iPhone XS Max has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy C7, because although it has a back facing camera with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture and a way higher (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy C7 has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than iPhone XS Max, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy C7 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 128 GB. The Galaxy C7 has a bit better battery performance than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.