Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62.9 | 69.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | Nokia |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Windows Phone 8.1 |
| 2016-02-18 | 2014-04-02 |
| 6.23 x 3.26 x 0.34 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Black, Green, Orange and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 208.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 490 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 8974-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 1.20 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.40 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3610mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2420mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 552 hours standby time 11.5 hours talk time |
| 5.6 | 4.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Lumia 930 is a bit better than ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note, getting a score of 69.2 against 62.9. Even being the best in this comparison review, the Lumia 930 is an older, somewhat thicker and heavier phone than ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note. The Lumia 930 counts with Windows Phone 8.1 operating system, while ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note works with Android 6.0 Marshmallow operating system.
The Nokia Lumia 930 counts with a bit better looking screen than ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note, although it has a quite lower pixels amount per display inch, a quite smaller display and a lot worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution. The ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note features much more storage for apps and games than Lumia 930, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note also has a SD card slot that holds up to 128 GB.
Nokia Lumia 930 features a little faster CPU than ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with an additional graphics processor. ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note has a much longer battery performance than Lumia 930, because it has a 3610mAh battery capacity.
The Lumia 930 takes slightly better videos and photos than ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note, because although it has a smaller aperture and slower 24 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Lumia 930 also counts with a higher resolution back facing camera.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Nokia Lumia 930 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.