Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62.9 | 67.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 4.1.2, 4.0.4, 4.0.3, 2.3.5, 2.3.4 |
| 2016-02-18 | 2011-09-01 |
| 6.23 x 3.26 x 0.34 inches | 5.78 x 3.27 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 252.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 800 x 1280 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 490 pixels per inch | 285 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Samsung Exynos 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 5.72 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 8.25 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS and GSM |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6 | 4.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3610mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2500mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 960 hours standby time 26 hours talk time |
| 5.6 | 4.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 3.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note has a general score of 67.5, which is slightly better than ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note's global score of 62.9. Despite being the best in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy Note's construction is notably older, somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than the ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note has 4.1.2 version while ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note features a bit better performance than Galaxy Note, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and 6 more cores. The ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Note, because it has way more pixels per inch of display, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a quite larger display.
ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note, because it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 128 GB and more internal storage capacity. ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note has a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note, because it has a 44% bigger battery size.
ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note, because it has a much larger aperture for better captures in low light environments, a way higher 3840x2160 video quality and a back facing camera with a way higher 16 mega pixels resolution.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy Note is also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.