Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Vivo |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-25 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.26 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is just a bit better than the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), with a 77.8 score against 77.8. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro design is notably newer and a lot thinner, but somewhat heavier than Asus ZenFone 6 (2019). Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has 14 version and Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) has Android 11.
Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) features a much more powerful processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 10 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much more vibrant screen than Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), because it has a bigger display, a lot better resolution of 2200 x 2480 and a quite greater display density.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better camera than Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), because it has a larger camera aperture for better photos in low light environments, a back camera with more mega-pixels, a way higher video definition and a lot bigger back camera sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a bit longer battery life than Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), because it has a 14 percent greater battery capacity.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Asus ZenFone 6 (2019). So if you need that extra specs, you can buy vivo X Fold 3 Pro, else you can save some dollars and buy the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.