Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-12-20 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.24 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit better than the Asus ZenFone Max (M2), getting a 77.8 score against 71.6. Even though vivo X Fold 3 Pro is incredibly heavier than Asus ZenFone Max (M2), it's incredibly thinner and notably newer. Both phones in this review use Android operating system, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has older 14 version while Asus ZenFone Max (M2) has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Asus ZenFone Max (M2) counts with a very superior CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features an incredibly better looking display than Asus ZenFone Max (M2), because it has a way better 2200 x 2480 resolution, a bigger screen and a lot higher display density.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior camera than Asus ZenFone Max (M2), because it has a back camera with lot more mega pixels, a larger diafragm aperture and a much higher video definition. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better storage for apps and games than Asus ZenFone Max (M2), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior battery lifetime than Asus ZenFone Max (M2), because it has a 43% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.