Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Blackberry | Vivo |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-10-25 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.06 x 2.97 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black | Black and White |
| Glass and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 499.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than BlackBerry DTEK60, with a 77.8 score against 71.5. Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is extremely heavier than BlackBerry DTEK60, it's incredibly thinner and also incredibly newer. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an older 14 version while BlackBerry DTEK60 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better looking screen than BlackBerry DTEK60, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a lot larger screen and a better 2200 x 2480 resolution. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than BlackBerry DTEK60, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The BlackBerry DTEK60 counts with a very superior processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory and less cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior battery duration than BlackBerry DTEK60, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures a lot better videos and photos than BlackBerry DTEK60, because it has a way higher video quality, a way better resolution camera in the back and a larger aperture for better photography in low-light environments.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the BlackBerry DTEK60, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the BlackBerry DTEK60. So if you need that extra features, you can buy vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the BlackBerry DTEK60, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.