Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-05-09 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is better than the Blackview BL8800 Pro, having an 83.7 score against 71.9. The LG V50 ThinQ construction is much lighter and notably thinner than the Blackview BL8800 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. These devices have Android operating system, but LG V50 ThinQ has older 10 version and Blackview BL8800 Pro has Android 11 version.
LG V50 ThinQ features a bit superior CPU than Blackview BL8800 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid screen than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120.
The LG V50 ThinQ shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has a lot less MP back camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited environments. The LG V50 ThinQ has much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Blackview BL8800 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Blackview BL8800 Pro has a very superior battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has an 8380mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.