Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-09 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 400 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is a lot better than Blackview BL8800 Pro, with a global score of 91.8 against 71.9. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding that. The Galaxy A71 5G body is much lighter and incredibly thinner than Blackview BL8800 Pro, although it was released about a year before.
Galaxy A71 5G features just a bit better hardware performance than Blackview BL8800 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Blackview BL8800 Pro counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2408.
Galaxy A71 5G has a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Blackview BL8800 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G shoots greater videos and photos than Blackview BL8800 Pro, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
Blackview BL8800 Pro features a much longer battery life than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has an 8380mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.