Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-09 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 400 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is much better than Blackview BL8800, having a score of 91.8 against 71.9. These phones come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). The Galaxy A71 5G construction is notably lighter and incredibly thinner than Blackview BL8800, even though it was released about a year before.
The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit better processing unit than Blackview BL8800, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Blackview BL8800 features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2408.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a very superior camera than Blackview BL8800, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a back camera with a lot better 64 mega-pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a superior storage for games and applications than Blackview BL8800, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Blackview BL8800 features a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has 8380mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.