Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is a lot better than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12's score of 71.5. Galaxy A71 5G is a a little bit lighter and just a little thinner cellphone than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A71 5G has the previous 11 version and Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13 version.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a little bit bigger display, a little better pixels density and a little bit higher 1080 x 2460px resolution. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a little bit better memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with a little bit better performance than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy A71 5G shoots way better photos and videos than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. They have the same resolution back facing camera.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.