Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is better than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, with an 81 score against 71.5. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has 6.0 Marshmallow version while Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13, so it gives you some extra features and enhanced performance. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's body is thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2460, a just a bit better pixel number in each inch in the display and a little bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy C9 Pro captures a bit better pictures and videos than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a back facing camera with way less mega-pixels. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.