Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 52.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Celkon | LG |
| Android 4.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.65 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6592M chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 3.20 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.49 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is way better than the Celkon Millennia OCTA510, with a overall score of 83.7 against 52.6. LG V50 ThinQ's body is notably heavier but a little thinner than the Celkon Millennia OCTA510. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V50 ThinQ has a more recent 10 version and Celkon Millennia OCTA510 has Android 4.4, counting with some nice extra features and performance tweaks.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a little bit better looking screen than Celkon Millennia OCTA510, because it has a bigger display, a way better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a way higher quantity of pixels per inch of display. LG V50 ThinQ features a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Celkon Millennia OCTA510, because it has 120 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit faster processor than Celkon Millennia OCTA510, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, and they both have 8 cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better camera than Celkon Millennia OCTA510, because it has a lot better video quality and a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
LG V50 ThinQ features a very superior battery duration than Celkon Millennia OCTA510, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2000mAh.
The LG V50 ThinQ is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the Celkon Millennia OCTA510.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.