Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 5.1, 5.0 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2014-10-15 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1019.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 490 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6 has a score of 81.1, which is a bit better than Galaxy C9 Pro's overall score of 81. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Google Nexus 6 has 5.1 version and Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Google Nexus 6's design is a little lighter than the Galaxy C9 Pro, but it is thicker and was released 2 years before.
The Google Nexus 6 counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. Google Nexus 6 has a brighter display than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a same size screen, the Google Nexus 6 also has a better pixel quantity in each inch in the display and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
Google Nexus 6 has just a bit better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and a back facing camera with a worse 13 MP resolution, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has longer battery duration than Google Nexus 6, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.