Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| 2015-11-02 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XR is a little bit better than the Google Nexus 6P, getting a general score of 82 against 80.3. The Apple iPhone XR is a much newer phone than the Google Nexus 6P, although it is a little heavier and somewhat thicker. The Google Nexus 6P features a little sharper screen than iPhone XR, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a much better quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
The Google Nexus 6P counts with a superior storage capacity for applications and games than iPhone XR, because it has more internal memory. IPhone XR features a better performance than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has less processing cores (although faster), and they both have a 3 GB RAM memory, the iPhone XR also counts with a 64 bits processor.
IPhone XR takes slightly better photographs and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition, a lesser MP resolution back-facing camera and a smaller sensor giving a lower image quality, it also counts with a larger aperture. The Google Nexus 6P features just a little bit longer battery duration than iPhone XR, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity against 2942mAh.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it is more expensive than the Google Nexus 6P, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Nexus 6P. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Google Nexus 6P, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.