Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| 2015-11-02 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS has a score of 84.2, which is just a bit better than Google Nexus 6P's general score of 80.3. The iPhone XS is a incredibly newer and just a little bit lighter device than Google Nexus 6P, although it's also just a bit thicker. Apple iPhone XS counts with a better CPU than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with 1 GB more RAM memory and a 64 bits processing unit.
The Apple iPhone XS features just a bit better looking display than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a just a bit lower display density, it also counts with a little bit larger screen. Google Nexus 6P has a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than iPhone XS, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
IPhone XS takes slightly better videos and photos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a lower video definition, a lower resolution back facing camera and a smaller sensor which offers a worse image and video quality, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better photos in low light situations.
The Google Nexus 6P counts with greater battery life than iPhone XS, because it has a 30% greater battery capacity.
Although iPhone XS is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Nexus 6P, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Nexus 6P. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy iPhone XS, else you can save some dollars and buy the Google Nexus 6P, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.