Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| 2015-11-02 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than the Google Nexus 6P's 80.3 score. Google Pixel 4's construction is incredibly newer and a little bit lighter, but just a little bit thicker than the Google Nexus 6P. The Google Nexus 6P has a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Google Nexus 6P also has a just a bit better screen pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Google Pixel 4 has just a bit better performance than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a higher amount of RAM. Google Nexus 6P captures slightly better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Google Nexus 6P also counts with a bigger camera sensor capturing higher quality photos and a better 12.3 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
The Google Nexus 6P counts with much more storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal memory. Google Nexus 6P features better battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Google Pixel 4 is also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.