Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| 2015-11-02 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 515 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P is a bit better than the HTC U Ultra, having a score of 80.3 against 77. The Google Nexus 6P design is a bit thinner than HTC U Ultra, although it's a little heavier and was released around 16 months before. Google Nexus 6P features a little more vivid display than HTC U Ultra. Both of them have a same size screen, a better pixel number in each inch in the screen and exactly the same 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The HTC U Ultra has a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Google Nexus 6P has a bit more powerful processing unit than HTC U Ultra, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with more CPU cores.
The Google Nexus 6P counts with a bit longer battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 15% more battery size. HTC U Ultra and Google Nexus 6P count with very similar cameras, because although the HTC U Ultra has a lower (4K) video resolution and a back camera with lesser MP, and they both have the same sensor size, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Google Nexus 6P is also cheaper than the HTC U Ultra, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.