Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2015-11-02 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 649.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P has a global score of 80.3, which is slightly better than Motorola One Action's 78.5 score. Google Nexus 6P is a way older and a bit heavier cellphone than the Motorola One Action, but Google made it thinner anyway. The Motorola One Action has a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola One Action also has more RAM memory.
Google Nexus 6P features a little bit better display than Motorola One Action, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a little higher display density. Motorola One Action has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Motorola One Action also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Google Nexus 6P counts with a bit better camera than Motorola One Action, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing photos and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Google Nexus 6P also counts with a camera in the back with a higher resolution.
Motorola One Action has a battery life that is very similar to the battery duration in Google Nexus 6P, although the Motorola One Action also has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3450mAh.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola One Action. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola One Action, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.