Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2015-11-02 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P is a little bit better than Motorola One Zoom, having a score of 80.3 against 80. Although Google Nexus 6P is older than the Motorola One Zoom, it's construction is a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner. The Motorola One Zoom and Google Nexus 6P have similar processors, and although the Motorola One Zoom has more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Google Nexus 6P counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch of screen. The Motorola One Zoom has a very superior storage to install games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Zoom also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 128 GB.
Motorola One Zoom features just a bit longer battery life than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3450mAh. Motorola One Zoom has a much better camera than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One Zoom also has a larger camera aperture, a lot more mega-pixels back camera and a larger camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola One Zoom, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One Zoom. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Motorola One Zoom, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.