Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-11-02 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 649.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a general score of 87, which is a bit better than Google Nexus 6P's general score of 80.3. Although the Motorola razr (2020) is notably newer than the Google Nexus 6P, it is just a bit thicker and a bit heavier. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 5 GB more RAM.
Google Nexus 6P features a bit better looking screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and more pixels per display inch. Motorola razr (2020) captures better videos and photos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a back camera with a much better resolution, a bigger camera aperture to take better low light images and video and a larger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a way bigger storage for apps and games than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. The Google Nexus 6P features improved battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Nexus 6P, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Nexus 6P. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Motorola razr (2020), otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Nexus 6P, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.