Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-11-02 | 2019-10-05 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 649.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 515 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P is slightly better than Galaxy A20s, with an 80.3 score against 77. Google Nexus 6P is an incredibly older cellphone than Galaxy A20s, but Google was able to build it a little thinner and just a bit lighter anyway. The Google Nexus 6P has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A20s, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Google Nexus 6P counts with a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher screen pixels density and a way better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A20s features a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Google Nexus 6P counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing photos and/or video in poorly lited situations and a worse 12.3 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video quality and a much bigger camera sensor capturing way better quality photos.
Samsung Galaxy A20s counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 16% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.