Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-11-02 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 649.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P has a score of 80.3, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A30s's score of 79.8. Google Nexus 6P is an extremely older and a bit heavier cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A30s, but Google managed to make it just a little bit thinner anyway. The Google Nexus 6P counts with a better display than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher amount of pixels per inch of screen and a much higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A30s has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A30s also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. Google Nexus 6P features a bit better CPU than Galaxy A30s, although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Google Nexus 6P counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for capturing photos in low light situations and a back-facing camera with a way lower resolution, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video quality. Samsung Galaxy A30s counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.