Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2015-11-02 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 649.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P has a global score of 80.3, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy M20's 78.9 overall score. Google Nexus 6P is an extremely older phone than Samsung Galaxy M20, but Google was able to make it just a little lighter and thinner. The Google Nexus 6P counts with a little bit better display than Galaxy M20, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
Google Nexus 6P features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M20, although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Google Nexus 6P has a little bit better camera than Galaxy M20, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and videos and a camera in the back with lesser MP, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures and a much better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Galaxy M20 features a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy M20 features a way better battery duration than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 45% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.