Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2015-11-02 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 649.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M30 is a little bit better than Google Nexus 6P, with a overall score of 82.4 against 80.3. Even though the Samsung Galaxy M30 is thicker than the Google Nexus 6P, it's just a little lighter and a lot newer. Google Nexus 6P features a bit better CPU than Galaxy M30, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Google Nexus 6P features a little bit better screen than Galaxy M30, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch of display. Google Nexus 6P features just a bit better camera than Galaxy M30, because although it has a smaller aperture and a lesser mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a lot bigger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality photographs and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy M30 features a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy M30 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy M30 has a much better battery performance than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 45% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.