Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2015-11-02 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 has an overall score of 89, which is much better than the Google Nexus 6P's 80.3 overall score. The Galaxy Note10 construction is a lot newer and just a little lighter than Google Nexus 6P's, but it is just a little bit thicker. Galaxy Note10 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Google Nexus 6P counts with just a bit better screen than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater pixel density. Samsung Galaxy Note10 features just a bit better camera than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a back camera with less mega-pixels resolution, a worse (4K) video resolution and a tinier sensor capturing less light and duller colors, it also counts with a much larger camera aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a superior memory for games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, because it has more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note10's battery performance is very similar to the battery duration in Google Nexus 6P, although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a 1% greater battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 costs a lot more than the Google Nexus 6P, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.