Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-11-02 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 649.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the Google Nexus 6P, having a score of 94.6 against 80.3. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is extremely newer and just a bit thinner, but also extremely heavier than Google Nexus 6P. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little faster CPU than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Google Nexus 6P features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1440 x 2560, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots clearer photographs and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back-facing camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photos and a larger aperture for better low-light photography and videos.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has improved battery duration than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3450mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Nexus 6P, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Nexus 6P. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Nexus 6P, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.