Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-11-02 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 649.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is slightly better than the Google Nexus 6P, having a score of 84.3 against 80.3. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4's design is newer and way thinner, but also way heavier than the Google Nexus 6P. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a better looking screen than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a higher 2224 x 2488 resolution and a much bigger screen.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Google Nexus 6P features an extremely better processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a much better battery duration than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 48% bigger battery capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 takes a lot better photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture for better captures and videos in low-light situations, a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.