Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-11-02 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P has an overall score of 80.3, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Poco M3's global score of 78.2. Google Nexus 6P's body is lighter and incredibly thinner than Xiaomi Poco M3, despite of the fact that it was released 5 years before. Google Nexus 6P has just a bit better display than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater screen density.
Xiaomi Poco M3 features a better storage capacity for applications and games than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a CPU that's just as good as the Google Nexus 6P one, and although the Xiaomi Poco M3 has more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Xiaomi Poco M3 takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a camera with way more MP, a larger aperture for better low-light photography and a larger sensor.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a much longer battery performance than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Poco M3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Poco M3. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Xiaomi Poco M3, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.