Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-11-02 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Silver and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 649.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an overall score of 81.1, which is a little bit better than the Google Nexus 6P's score of 80.3. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro body is noticeably newer, but somewhat heavier and thicker than Google Nexus 6P. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bit better hardware performance than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 3 GB more RAM.
Google Nexus 6P counts with a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher pixels number per display inch. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a greater memory capacity for games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much longer battery duration than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 3450mAh. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures way better photographs and videos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a larger aperture to take better captures in poorly lited environments, a much bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.