Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 6.0 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-09-29 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Aurora black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 760.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is slightly better than Google Nexus 6P, having an 83.7 score against 79.6. LG V50 ThinQ's design is newer than Google Nexus 6P's, but it is just a little heavier and somewhat thicker. Both phones in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V50 ThinQ has newer 10 version and Google Nexus 6P has Android 6.0 version, so it gives you a couple nice extra features and performance optimizations.
LG V50 ThinQ has a quite superior processing power than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 3 GB more RAM memory and more cores. The Google Nexus 6P counts with a slightly better display than LG V50 ThinQ, although it has a little inferior count of pixels per inch in the screen, a little smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
LG V50 ThinQ captures slightly better pictures and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a smaller sensor shooting worse quality pictures and videos and a less MP camera, it also counts with a lot larger camera aperture for better photos and videos in poorly lited situations.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ features just a little bit longer battery life than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ is not only the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.