Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has an overall score of 81.6, which is slightly better than vivo X70 Pro's global score of 78.3. Google Pixel 2's body has the same thickness than the vivo X70 Pro, but it is way lighter. The Google Pixel 2 features a little bit better screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a way smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit higher screen pixels density.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit superior processor than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM memory. The vivo X70 Pro counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 2, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The vivo X70 Pro features a superior battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 65 percent more battery size. The vivo X70 Pro takes greater photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the vivo X70 Pro also has faster video frame rate, a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited situations, a much higher 50 MP resolution back-facing camera and a much bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.