Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 522 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G has a global score of 91.8, which is much better than Google Pixel 3 XL's overall score of 80.7. Although Galaxy A71 5G is newer than Google Pixel 3 XL, it's a bit thicker and just a bit heavier. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
The Galaxy A71 5G has a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's processing unit is just as good as the processor in Google Pixel 3 XL, and although the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has more RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 31 percent larger battery capacity. Galaxy A71 5G counts with a very superior camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, a F1.8 camera aperture and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a much bigger camera sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality and a camera with way more MP.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 3 XL, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.