Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 75.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-07 | 2017-03-10 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 5.86 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black and Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | $ 163.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL is just a bit better than the LG G6, getting a 78.9 score against 75.6. Google Pixel 3a XL's design is noticeably newer than LG G6's, but it's just a little heavier and a little bit thicker. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 3a XL has older 11 version while LG G6 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a bit better hardware performance than LG G6, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Google Pixel 3a XL also has a greater number of cores (although they are slower). The LG G6 counts with a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 and more pixels per inch of screen.
LG G6 features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 3a XL has a bit better camera than LG G6, because although it has a lower (4K) video definition and a back facing camera with lesser megapixels resolution, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Google Pixel 3a XL also counts with a bigger sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality.
The Google Pixel 3a XL has just a bit better battery lifetime than LG G6, because it has a 3700mAh battery size.
Google Pixel 3a XL costs a bit more money than LG G6, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.