Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-11-19 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Black and Gold |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a score of 87.5, which is just a bit better than Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 overall score. Google Pixel 4a 5G's construction is a lot newer and lighter than the Galaxy C9 Pro's, but it's also somewhat thicker. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has the previous 11 version while Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bigger display, a slightly higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little greater pixels density. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy C9 Pro. Both have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lot lower 12.2 MP resolution, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition and a larger aperture to capture better images and videos in low light environments.
Galaxy C9 Pro features a slightly bigger storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a bit superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3885mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.