Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| 2016-10-20 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a global score of 82.9, which is slightly better than Google Pixel XL's general score of 81.3. Google Pixel 4 XL's design is extremely newer and a little thinner, but heavier than the Google Pixel XL. Google Pixel 4 XL has a slightly better screen than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have a better pixel amount per inch in the screen, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a bit bigger display.
The Google Pixel XL features a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4 more cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 XL's camera is just as good as Google Pixel XL's camera, because although the Google Pixel 4 XL has a less mega pixels camera in the back, a smaller sensor shooting lower quality photographs and videos and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photos and videos.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features a little longer battery life than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 7 percent greater battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4 XL not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.