Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is much better than the Google Pixel XL, having a 91.2 score against 81.3. The LG Wing body is newer than Google Pixel XL's, but it is a lot heavier and extremely thicker. The LG Wing has a bit superior processor than Google Pixel XL, because it has a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel XL has a little bit better display than LG Wing, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a little bit higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. LG Wing features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG Wing shoots much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the LG Wing also has a much better 64 MP resolution back-facing camera, a bigger aperture, faster video frame rate and a way bigger sensor taking lot better quality videos and pictures.
The LG Wing has a little better battery life than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 16% bigger battery capacity.
LG Wing costs more money than the Google Pixel XL, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.