Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a score of 83.4, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel XL's overall score of 81.3. Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a somewhat heavier cellphone than the Google Pixel XL, but they are equally thin. Google Pixel XL has a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has an inferior number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a little sharper display than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a way worse pixel density, it also counts with a bigger display. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro shoots greater photographs and videos than Google Pixel XL, because it has a much better video resolution, a way larger camera sensor shooting much higher quality pictures and videos, a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution and a bigger aperture for better images in low-light situations.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 3450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.