Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is slightly better than the Google Pixel XL, with an 87.1 score against 81.3. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design has the same thickness than the Google Pixel XL, but it is heavier. Google Pixel XL features a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory and a lower number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a better looking screen than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a way lower display pixels density and a little bit lower 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a bigger display. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a superior storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel XL, because it has 512 GB internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes much better videos and photos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a much more megapixels camera, a larger camera aperture for better photos and videos in low-light situations, a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality and better video frame rates.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with better battery duration than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 30 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.