Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2016-10-20 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 869.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL is a bit better than the Motorola One Action, getting an 81.3 score against 78.5. The Google Pixel XL is an way older phone than the Motorola One Action, but Google made it a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter. The Google Pixel XL features a little sharper display than Motorola One Action, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a just a bit higher count of pixels in each inch of screen.
Motorola One Action counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Action also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1000 GB. The Motorola One Action has a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Motorola One Action also has a greater number of faster cores.
The Motorola One Action's battery life is very similar to the Google Pixel XL one, although the Motorola One Action also has a 3500mAh battery capacity against 3450mAh. Google Pixel XL shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola One Action, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Google Pixel XL also counts with a back camera with more MP.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola One Action. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Google Pixel XL, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola One Action, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.