Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2016-10-20 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL has a general score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than the Motorola One Vision's 80.7 general score. Google Pixel XL's body has the same thickness than Motorola One Vision, but it's a bit lighter. The Google Pixel XL counts with a little bit better looking display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel quantity in each display inch and a little higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
Motorola One Vision counts with a bit better CPU than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Motorola One Vision also has a higher number of cores. Motorola One Vision counts with a better camera than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the Motorola One Vision also has a bigger camera aperture to take better photos and video in low light situations, a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality and a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
The Motorola One Vision features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Vision also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB. Motorola One Vision has a battery lifetime that's just as good as the Google Pixel XL one, although the Motorola One Vision also has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.