Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL has an overall score of 81.3, which is a bit better than Nokia XR20's 80.8 global score. The Google Pixel XL is an notably older cellphone than the Nokia XR20, but Google could make it somewhat thinner and noticeably lighter anyway. The Google Pixel XL counts with a little bit better display than Nokia XR20, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixel count per inch in the display.
The Nokia XR20 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has a larger amount of RAM and more cpu cores (but slower). The Nokia XR20 features a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Nokia XR20 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB.
Nokia XR20 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Nokia XR20 also has better 60 frames per second video frame rates, a bigger aperture and a lot more megapixels back-facing camera.
Nokia XR20 features longer battery life than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity against 3450mAh.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Nokia XR20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Nokia XR20. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Google Pixel XL, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Nokia XR20, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.