Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2016-10-20 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 869.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is better than the Google Pixel XL, with a 90.7 score against 81.3. Galaxy A52's body is notably newer and just a little thinner, but also heavier than Google Pixel XL. The Google Pixel XL counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a little better performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3450mAh. The Galaxy A52 has a lot better camera than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better captures and videos in low light environments, a way larger camera sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality and a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.