Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2016-10-20 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a global score of 86.3, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel XL's 81.3 overall score. Samsung Galaxy S10e's body is notably newer, just a little thinner and somewhat lighter than the Google Pixel XL. Google Pixel XL counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a just a little better pixel density.
The Galaxy S10e counts with just a little better processing power than Google Pixel XL, because it has a larger number of cores (and also faster) and a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S10e has a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB.
The Google Pixel XL features a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy S10e, because it has an 11% more battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S10e takes a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a back-facing camera with less mega pixels resolution, a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a smaller back-facing camera sensor giving a lower image quality, it also counts with a way larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Galaxy S10e is also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.