Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than the Google Pixel XL, having a 98 score against 81.3. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction is newer than the Google Pixel XL's, although it's noticeably heavier and just a little thicker. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit superior processor than Google Pixel XL, because it has 8 GB more RAM and a higher number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit better looking display than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a just a bit inferior amount of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a bigger display. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes way better photographs and videos than Google Pixel XL, because it has a back camera with a much higher resolution, a larger back-facing camera sensor, a bigger aperture and a lot better video resolution. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3450mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel XL, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.