Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 869.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 534 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL is a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a score of 81.3 against 80.1. Although Google Pixel XL is a lot older than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, it's body is notably thinner and incredibly lighter. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little more vivid display than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have an equal 1440 x 2560 resolution, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features more storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel XL, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a greater number of faster cores.
Google Pixel XL has a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures, a back camera with more megapixels and a way higher 3840x2160 video definition. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with greater battery life than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 30% larger battery size.
The Google Pixel XL is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.